Domestic animals and responsibility

Domesticated animals only exist in such a state because humans have developed them to be dependent on us. By this, I refer largely to dogs, cats, and other animals who have actually developed differently due to human intervention. These animals can no longer survive in our world on their own, hence why homelessness is just as much an issue for pets as it is for humans. While some organizations exist for the welfare of these animals, most of the money allocated for this cause is donation based, and is not enough. It is our responsibility to tax first world citizens for the care of these animals- as their survival skills are only as impaired as they are as a result of our selected them in such a way. Until then, we likely have an obligation to make some contribution towards the welfare of homeless pets, whether through donation, adoption, volunteering or awareness.

Response to Raj's post Vegetarianism vs. Veganism

 Found here.

If one should use another living being for their own ends, then they at least are morally obliged to find out the details regarding said exploitation. If one is provided food and can not acquire appropriate information regarding process and consequence, then, that is perhaps in line with your statement, however, in America, for instance- while not over publicized- it is no secret that there is perhaps something seriously wrong with the production of milk and eggs. While I do not necessarily agree that even aware vegetarians have an obligation to veganism, Americans (at least) have the opportunity and responsibility to alleviate potential ignorance regarding the use of other living beings, and as such, a defense of local vegetarians based on ignorance is questionable.